How to find integer nth roots?

Posted on

Question :

How to find integer nth roots?

I want to find the greatest integer less than or equal to the kth root of n. I tried

int(n**(1/k))

But for n=125, k=3 this gives the wrong answer! I happen to know that 5 cubed is 125.

>>> int(125**(1/3))
4

What’s a better algorithm?


Background: In 2011, this slip-up cost me beating Google Code Jam. https://code.google.com/codejam/contest/dashboard?c=1150486#s=p2

Answer #1:

One solution first brackets the answer between lo and hi by repeatedly multiplying hi by 2 until n is between lo and hi, then uses binary search to compute the exact answer:

def iroot(k, n):
    hi = 1
    while pow(hi, k) < n:
        hi *= 2
    lo = hi // 2
    while hi - lo > 1:
        mid = (lo + hi) // 2
        midToK = pow(mid, k)
        if midToK < n:
            lo = mid
        elif n < midToK:
            hi = mid
        else:
            return mid
    if pow(hi, k) == n:
        return hi
    else:
        return lo

A different solution uses Newton’s method, which works perfectly well on integers:

def iroot(k, n):
    u, s = n, n+1
    while u < s:
        s = u
        t = (k-1) * s + n // pow(s, k-1)
        u = t // k
    return s
Answered By: Colonel Panic

Answer #2:

How about:

def nth_root(val, n):
    ret = int(val**(1./n))
    return ret + 1 if (ret + 1) ** n == val else ret

print nth_root(124, 3)
print nth_root(125, 3)
print nth_root(126, 3)
print nth_root(1, 100)

Here, both val and n are expected to be integer and positive. This makes the return expression rely exclusively on integer arithmetic, eliminating any possibility of rounding errors.

Note that accuracy is only guaranteed when val**(1./n) is fairly small. Once the result of that expression deviates from the true answer by more than 1, the method will no longer give the correct answer (it’ll give the same approximate answer as your original version).

Still I am wondering why int(125**(1/3)) is 4

In [1]: '%.20f' % 125**(1./3)
Out[1]: '4.99999999999999911182'

int() truncates that to 4.

Answered By: user448810

Answer #3:

My cautious solution after being so badly burned:

def nth_root(N,k):
    """Return greatest integer x such that x**k <= N"""
    x = int(N**(1/k))      
    while (x+1)**k <= N:
        x += 1
    while x**k > N:
        x -= 1
    return x
Answered By: NPE

Answer #4:

Why not to try this :

125 ** (1 / float(3)) 

or

pow(125, 1 / float(3))

It returns 5.0, so you can use int(), to convert to int.

Answered By: Colonel Panic

Answer #5:

Here it is in Lua using Newton-Raphson method

> function nthroot (x, n) local r = 1; for i = 1, 16 do r = (((n - 1) * r) + x / (r ^ (n -   1))) / n end return r end
> return nthroot(125,3)
5
> 

Python version

>>> def nthroot (x, n):
...     r = 1
...     for i in range(16):
...             r = (((n - 1) * r) + x / (r ** (n - 1))) / n
...     return r
... 
>>> nthroot(125,3)
5
>>> 
Answered By: Natig Aliyev

Answer #6:

I wonder if starting off with a method based on logarithms can help pin down the sources of rounding error. For example:

import math
def power_floor(n, k):
    return int(math.exp(1.0 / k * math.log(n)))

def nth_root(val, n):
    ret = int(val**(1./n))
    return ret + 1 if (ret + 1) ** n == val else ret

cases = [
    (124, 3),
    (125, 3),
    (126, 3),
    (1, 100),
    ]


for n, k in cases:
    print "{0:d} vs {1:d}".format(nth_root(n, k), power_floor(n, k))

prints out

4 vs 4
5 vs 5
5 vs 5
1 vs 1
Answered By: Doug Currie

Answer #7:

def nth_root(n, k):
    x = n**(1./k)
    y = int(x)
    return y + 1 if y != x else y
Answered By: Escualo

Answer #8:

You can round to nearest integer instead of rounding down / to zero (I don’t know what Python specifies) :

def rtn (x):
    return int (x + 0.5)

>>> rtn (125 ** (1/3))
5
Answered By: ecline6

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *