**Problem :**

Am I doing modulus wrong? Because in Java `-13 % 64`

evaluates to `-13`

but I want to get `51`

.

**Solution :**

Both definitions of modulus of negative numbers are in use – some languages use one definition and some the other.

If you want to get a negative number for negative inputs then you can use this:

```
int r = x % n;
if (r > 0 && x < 0)
{
r -= n;
}
```

Likewise if you were using a language that returns a negative number on a negative input and you would prefer positive:

```
int r = x % n;
if (r < 0)
{
r += n;
}
```

Since “mathematically” both are correct:

```
-13 % 64 = -13 (on modulus 64)
-13 % 64 = 51 (on modulus 64)
```

One of the options had to be chosen by Java language developers and they chose:

the sign of the result equals the sign of the dividend.

Says it in Java specs:

https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-15.html#jls-15.17.3

Are you sure you are working in Java? ’cause Java gives -13 % 64 = -13 as expected. The sign of dividend!

**Note that this answer was for a previous, different version of the question.**

Your result is wrong for Java.

Please provide some context how you arrived at it (your program, implementation and version of Java).

From the Java Language Specification

15.17.3 Remainder Operator %

[…]

The remainder operation for operands that are integers after binary numeric promotion (ยง5.6.2) produces a result value such that (a/b)*b+(a%b) is equal to a.

15.17.2 Division Operator /

[…]

Integer division rounds toward 0.

Since / is rounded towards zero (resulting in zero), the result of % should be negative in this case.

you can use

```
(x % n) - (x < 0 ? n : 0);
```

Your answer is in wikipedia:

modulo operation

It says, that in Java the sign on modulo operation is the same as that of dividend. and since we’re talking about the rest of the division operation is just fine, that it returns -13 in your case, since -13/64 = 0. -13-0 = -13.

EDIT: Sorry, misunderstood your question…You’re right, java should give -13. Can you provide more surrounding code?

Modulo arithmetic with negative operands is defined by the language designer, who might leave it to the language implementation, who might defer the definition to the CPU architecture.

~~I wasn’t able to find a Java language definition.~~

Thanks Ishtar, Java Language Specification for the Remainder Operator % says that the sign of the result is the same as the sign of the numerator.

To overcome this, you could add `64`

(or whatever your modulus base is) to the negative value until it is positive

```
int k = -13;
int modbase = 64;
while (k < 0) {
k += modbase;
}
int result = k % modbase;
```

The result will still be in the same equivalence class.

`x = x + m = x - m`

in modulus `m`

.

so `-13 = -13 + 64`

in modulus `64`

and `-13 = 51`

in modulus `64`

.

assume `Z = X * d + r`

, if `0 < r < X`

then in division `Z/X`

we call `r`

the remainder.

`Z % X`

returns the remainder of `Z/X`

.

The mod function is defined as the amount by which a number exceeds the largest integer multiple of the divisor that is not greater than that number. So in your case of

```
-13 % 64
```

the largest integer multiple of 64 that does not exceed -13 is -64. Now, when you subtract -13 from -64 it equals 51 `-13 - (-64) = -13 + 64 = 51`

In Java latest versions you get `-13%64 = -13`

. The answer will always have sign of numerator.

According to section 15.17.3 of the JLS, “The remainder operation for operands that are integers after binary numeric promotion produces a result value such that (a/b)*b+(a%b) is equal to a.

This identity holds even in the special case that the dividend is the negative integer of largest possible magnitude for its type and the divisor is -1 (the remainder is 0).”

Hope that helps.

I don’t think Java returns 51 in this case. I am running Java 8 on a Mac and I get:

```
-13 % 64 = -13
```

Program:

```
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i = -13;
int j = 64;
System.out.println(i % j);
}
}
```