Disable hash randomization from within python program

Posted on

Question :

Disable hash randomization from within python program

Starting with Python 3.3, the hashing algorithm is non-deterministically salted to avoid a certain kind of attack. This is nice for webservers but it’s a pain when trying to debug a program: Every time I run my script, dict contents are iterated in a different order.

Some earlier versions of python had a -R flag for enabling hash randomization, but now that it’s the default behavior, the flag has not been replaced by its opposite.
Randomization can be disabled by setting the environment variable PYTHONHASHSEED:


If this variable is not set or set to random, a random value is used to seed the hashes of str, bytes and datetime objects.
If PYTHONHASHSEED is set to an integer value, it is used as a fixed seed for generating the hash() of the types covered by the hash randomization.

The catch is that this variable must be set before launching the python process. I’ve tried to set it with os.putenv(), or in os.environ, but these seem to have no effect on the hashing method. This is not too surprising: I wouldn’t expect python to check the environment before every single set or dictionary lookup! So, the question remains:

Is there a way for a python program to disable its own hash randomization?

Asked By: alexis


Answer #1:

I suspect this isn’t possible, unfortunately. Looking at test_hash.py the HashRandomizationTests class and its descendants were added in the commit that introduced this behavior. They test the hashing behavior by modifying the environment and starting a new process with PYTHONHASHSEED explicitly set. You could try to copy that pattern, perhaps.

I also just noticed you said “Every time I run my script, dict contents are iterated in a different order.” – I assume you’re aware of collections.OrderedDict, right? That’s the normal way to get reliable hash iteration.

If you’re willing to set the value in your shell environment, you could also just wrap your python call in a bash script, e.g.

#! /bin/bash

# call your python program here

That avoids needing to manipulate your whole environment, as long as you’re ok with a wrapper script.

Or even just pass the value on the command line:

Answered By: alexis

Answer #2:

Apart from dictionary order, hash randomisation may also break existing code that uses hash() directly. A workaround that solved the problem for me in this case was to replace



int(hashlib.sha512(mystring).hexdigest(), 16)

For Python 3, a conversion like mystring.encode('utf-8') will be needed for standard strings. (I was working with byte strings.)

Note that the range of numbers and whether negative numbers are included are different. The latter code gives a much bigger range of numbers and hash collisions are extremely unlikely.

To reproduce the same 64-bit range as hash(), one could reduce the number of hexadecimal digits to 16 (4 bits per digit) and shift the result to start at the smallest negative 64-bit number:

int(hashlib.sha256(mystring).hexdigest()[:16], 16)-2**63

Alternatively, one can take 8 bytes and use int.from_bytes:

int.from_bytes(hashlib.sha256(mystring).digest()[:8], byteorder='big', signed=True)

Answered By: dimo414

Answer #3:

Maybe the only/cleanest way is to prepend this to the beginning of your program:

import os
import sys
hashseed = os.getenv('PYTHONHASHSEED')
if not hashseed:
    os.environ['PYTHONHASHSEED'] = '0'
    os.execv(sys.executable, [sys.executable] + sys.argv)

[the rest of your program]

If PYTHONHASHSEED is missing, it will set it to zero and replace the current program with a new, supplying the same set of arguments.
According to os.execv:

These functions all execute a new program, replacing the current
process; they do not return. On Unix, the new executable is loaded
into the current process, and will have the same process id as the
caller. Errors will be reported as OSError exceptions.

The current process is replaced immediately. Open file objects and
descriptors are not flushed, so if there may be data buffered on these
open files, you should flush them using sys.stdout.flush() or
os.fsync() before calling an exec* function.

Answered By: Joachim Wagner

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *